Negative Numbers - Fortune [possible satire]

tziOmwhat is the most efficient way to do: floor($foo/600)*600
ChibaPetum
Altreusfloor $foo
Altreus:P
DrForrPremature micro-optimization detected at line 0.
AltreusI think that /is/ the most efficient way to do it
ChibaPetwhat about int $foo?
ChibaPetor is floor more efficient?
AltreusI think this is rounding to the nearest 600
Altreuser, the lowest 600
Altreusint truncates towards 0
ChibaPetdoesn't floor do that as well?
DrForrYou're looking at micro-optimization in *math*. Surely there are bigger fish to fry?
AltreusChibaPet: consider negatives
ChibaPetOh! Negatives. Slipped right by me. Thanks.
Altreusthe difference in most operations is evident in negatives, except the various rounding techniques
fizzieNegative numbers, brr, they're just not natural.
Altreus:)
rindolffizzie: :-)
rindolffizzie: but they are real.
rindolffizzie: and they aren't imaginary or complex.
Altreusthey're not /that/ real
rindolffizzie: though they can be irrational.
rindolfHeh.
DrForr-5 ∈ ℝ
antoxI think tziOm wanted to round down to 10 minutes. Maybe s/.:..$/0:00/ is an option? :D
* Altreussmacks antox with a bin
* rindolfsmacks antox with a larger bin.
Altreusthis one http://www.suasnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/dusty1.gif
* ChibaPethands antox a fish.
shortenAltreus's url is at http://xrl.us/bmpbt6
rindolfMy bin is bigger than Altreus'.
DrForrRainbow trout all 'round!
Altreuswas that a pun
antoxAnyway guys, I haven't got if I should be proud of getting smacked by a bin.
Altreusno
Altreusit's pain-based learning
rindolfantox: you were smacked by two bins - one smaller, one larger.
Cipher-0You made a mistake???!one!!! Clean out your desk at once!!!!!!eleven!!!!!
antoxAnd no supper today!
Channel#perl
NetworkFreenode
TaglineDon't be so negative.
Published2012-01-20