A few people who criticised the article, claimed that by proposing that media will be free to be non-commercially copied, I've been violating the Golden Rule ("Treat others as you wish them to treat you") as I don't want copyright to be undermined for my own works.
However, this results from two confusions. The first is that I don't have problems with people re-distributing my work: it is all freely re-distributable and a most of it is also Free Content. The second confusion is that I completely reject copyrights. However that's not the case as I still accept that some copyright principles are valid.
So the I did not violate the Golden Rule in voicing this opinion.